Case study

LexIX · Legal tech

Lawyers spend disproportionate amounts of time reading contracts looking for the bits that aren't standard. LexIX flips it: the user supplies the firm's own contract standards, and the system reads incoming contracts, highlights the deviations, and explains why each one matters. Under the hood it's retrieval-augmented review over the user's own corpus. Their standards become the index, and the system does the matching.

  1. Contract review on a lawyer's desk
  2. Reading for deviations by hand

    Lawyers spend disproportionate time reading contracts looking for the bits that aren't standard. It is the 5% that doesn't match what the firm normally signs.

  3. Hours spent on the 5%

    Most of a contract is template; the value of the review sits in the deviations. But finding them still costs the hours of a senior lawyer.

  4. RAG over the firm's own standards

    LexIX flips it. The firm supplies its own standards; the system reads incoming contracts, highlights deviations, explains why each one matters. Retrieval-augmented review over the firm's own corpus.

  5. Drift-aftale, local model next

    Delivered as a drift-aftale at 6.000 DKK/month, moving toward fully local model deployment so sensitive contract data never leaves the firm.

More cases. More proof.